Valteim -
08.12.24 / 11:10 I'm sorry for pinging oof Valteim -
08.12.24 / 11:09 Nobody knows about it kavalafc, ask admins on Bf2Hub Discord Johnny_Canuck -
08.12.24 / 00:15 Ya on Operation Blue Pearl he was making some ridicules shots through the fog as well. kavalafc -
07.12.24 / 23:39 When the bf2hub will finish maintenance and we will have our stats updated? AIM-999 -
07.12.24 / 23:03 Hel707 shooting through the fog yesterday: https://youtu.be/bBkR_Bn_ _es LADY bgzaas -
04.12.24 / 23:06 New Cheater: Ksyronine Zbiry -
03.12.24 / 10:02 Shit eaters must disappear from BF2! Valteim -
02.12.24 / 20:23 First NoobYa2, then Dumbell. We're losing loud talkers Sn1p -
02.12.24 / 20:15 OMG I do not believe. Rumpell in the ban. Game chat clear without shit Johnny_Canuck -
02.12.24 / 18:36 Infact he would brag about it ingame all the time.
Posts: 126 Location: Pori, Finland Joined: 08.11.08
Posted on 10-11-2009 10:54
Arghh! omg i hate that singlecoil sound prefer humbucker
Whoever appeals to the law against his fellow man is either a fool or a coward. Whoever cannot take care of himself without that law is both. For a wounded man shall say to his assailant, "If I Die, You are forgiven. If I Live, I will kill you." Such is the Rule of Honor.
Posts: 126 Location: Pori, Finland Joined: 08.11.08
Posted on 14-11-2009 07:53
omg
Whoever appeals to the law against his fellow man is either a fool or a coward. Whoever cannot take care of himself without that law is both. For a wounded man shall say to his assailant, "If I Die, You are forgiven. If I Live, I will kill you." Such is the Rule of Honor.
Posts: 126 Location: Pori, Finland Joined: 08.11.08
Posted on 14-11-2009 09:22
Whoever appeals to the law against his fellow man is either a fool or a coward. Whoever cannot take care of himself without that law is both. For a wounded man shall say to his assailant, "If I Die, You are forgiven. If I Live, I will kill you." Such is the Rule of Honor.
Now , there is video material what i collected before patch 1.5 come out and we had the server changed... since a long time I want a new video for Karkand & Vehicles.
But then the track starts sucking from the 2nd break on - the bells playing the theme reminding me of energy 52 (whose tracks are btw. unreachable) are inappropriate, the reverb on the vocals, too - and the sample "David Guetta in the mix" 'tops' the whole thing. Such samples are okay in a very long dj set but not in a track.
Basically the 3rd break is too similar to the 2nd one so the last part lacks innovation.
The last 10-20s is too much trash and seem not to have any concept ("just fire up all tracks and mix them down... nobody's listening at the ends of tracks anyway").
A beat-only-driven outro would have been useful if you want to have tracks played by more djs.
EDIT: by the way - editing/remixing and publishing tracks without written permission of the owner is not allowed.
Hope for the best, prepare for the worst.
Edited by Krupp23 on 21-11-2009 14:24
Posts: 520 Location: Right behind you (Sweden,Sthlm) Joined: 05.07.07
Posted on 21-11-2009 20:55
Nice remix. Always nice to hear music other create. That's the spirit.
But as krupp already mentioned , your reverb is to much (common misstake). And it is pretty much repeating itself. Put down more time on it.
A tips is that when you have heard same thing over and over again, (When creating a tune over night as an example) you get to used to it. Cause you have heard it so many times you can't tell the difference anymore = Everything sound good.
Let it rest for a day without hearing it.
I use paper and pen , turn the song on and write down everything that sounds wrong at first play. And there is usually a lot that sounds wrong.
What you hear after a good nights sleep is the first impression a NEW listener hear (like us listened to it for the first time).
When listening to it again you might miss out some stuff.
=) else nice work. oh and leave out the "In the mix"
sounds good
but in the end its a bit too much ...like krupp said..the DJ want fade in next record in the end of song...
btw
the lawyer says its legal - because ist a coverversion and not a remix, and u can do a cover without permission of the artist if you make correct credits
doc_noc wrote:
the lawyer says its legal - because ist a coverversion and not a remix, and u can do a cover without permission of the artist if you make correct credits
Such a "pro-permission" statement isn't really credible without any source and thus very dangerous.
So: any source for your statement!?
I have a source for mine (in German):
§23 UrhG:
Bearbeitungen oder andere Umgestaltungen des Werkes dürfen nur mit Einwilligung des Urhebers des bearbeiteten oder umgestalteten Werkes veröffentlicht oder verwertet werden. Handelt es sich um eine Verfilmung des Werkes, um die Ausführung von Plänen und Entwürfen eines Werkes der bildenden Künste, um den Nachbau eines Werkes der Baukunst oder um die Bearbeitung oder Umgestaltung eines Datenbankwerkes, so bedarf bereits das Herstellen der Bearbeitung oder Umgestaltung der Einwilligung des Urhebers.
hehe ..its a cover-version
the difference -a remix is a new interpretation of a song
eg bob marlery in a techno version, you change the whole rhythm and everything
a coverversion dont change the original in his originally style
in this case:
original - commercial dance-trance
new version - commercial dance-trance
the whole story in german here :
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coverversion